iPod Classic/Nano vs. Zune 3.0

Forum Dweller Posts : 195 Registration date : 2008-02-20

Well I been wondering, everyone is crazy about iPods. I haven't found any areas that make iPod any better. You pretty much get a new Zune each year because they update your framework. Also Zune's have loads more of features. Give me at least 4 reasons that Ipod is better then. If you do I will change to an iPod fan. I am sure no one will be able too.

Beholder Posts : 257 Registration date : 2008-09-20

'Cause Apple makes it. Owned.

:face:

(Your obviously not changing Base)

Forum Dweller Posts : 195 Registration date : 2008-02-20

Kasper wrote:: 'Cause Apple makes it. Owned.

:face:

(Your obviously not changing Base)

You all here seem like Apple fan boys, I thought you would have at least some creative ideas why iPod is better. But as it seems you guys don't... :) Zune all the way.

Beholder Posts : 257 Registration date : 2008-09-20

Well since you said that... <IMG class=reflect title="" height=500 alt="funny zune and ipod by ♥ China ♥ guccio." src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/105/299105788_7c6e978068.jpg?v=0" width=373 onload=show_notes_initially();>
 
First of all, can Microsoft not think of something themselves? Like the zune is the biggest rip of all the big name MP3 players, to look like Apple. Second they're chunky and fat. Third the wheel to control what to do is confusing just by looking at it. Third the battery is 10 hours less lasting then the iPod Classic. Fourth, not open for mac users. 
 
 
I could go on all day.

Forum Dweller Posts : 195 Registration date : 2008-02-20

Kasper wrote:: Well since you said that... <IMG class=reflect title="" height=500 alt="funny zune and ipod by ♥ China ♥ guccio." src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/105/299105788_7c6e978068.jpg?v=0" width=373 onload=show_notes_initially();>
 
First of all, can Microsoft not think of something themselves? Like the zune is the biggest rip of all the big name MP3 players, to look like Apple. Second they're chunky and fat. Third the wheel to control what to do is confusing just by looking at it. Third the battery is 10 hours less lasting then the iPod Classic. Fourth, not open for mac users. 
 
 
I could go on all day.

Finally, this is what I was looking for! (I love debates, Lol) Ok, first off Zune are the same size as Ipod Classic now. Also The control pad is not a wheel. You can glide you figure down to move or side to side. It is that easy. Also you can turn off the touch pad to just click. Also zunes now have a Wifi store on the device that is amazing! So far no downs about Zunes. But I have to say you did good with the not open for Mac and shorter battery. Two downsides for the Zune. So two downs, Two more to go.

Zune can beat iPods in features any day.

Beholder Posts : 257 Registration date : 2008-09-20

The zune is thicker then the iPod but w/e.

Only one family to choose from... (ex. shuffle, Touch, nano, classic etc.)

Zune (160) only comes in one colour.

Forum Dweller Posts : 195 Registration date : 2008-02-20

Kasper wrote:: The zune is thicker then the iPod but w/e.

Only one family to choose from... (ex. shuffle, Touch, nano, classic etc.)

Zune (160) only comes in one colour.

Nope you wrong, it has two! It has Zune (120) which only comes in black at the moment. Also the Zune Flash (8) and (16) which comes in black, blue, red, pink, green.

This is a nice comparison chart.

http://www.zunescene.com/comparison/

Beholder Posts : 257 Registration date : 2008-09-20

I thought we were only talking about the big one? The Nano has more colours then the whole schlop of 'em.

Look, there's no way on this earth you'll ever be an Apple.

» iPod nano-chromatic vs. Ipod touch!! (OMG NO VOTES YET!)
» Zune, Ipod or a different MP3?
» iPod Touch 3G or Zune HD?
» iPod Nano
» iPod nano