| Ipod vs. mp3 player | |
|
+19xXD34thXD3alrXx Biggyp Argie JazzDawg RR KingdomDarkII Neo K0olsuperdood Dieg DK-Y2Y Mickey4741 Devious Dale Cj2 Dave jmg11 Goobenheimer Walmart Adsertif. Ninjaman6767 23 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Ninjaman6767 Vagabond
Posts : 81 Registration date : 2008-02-07
| Subject: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 21st 2008, 7:27 pm | |
| Which one do you like better?I think the ipod but i never really got one i have a mp3 player but not a ipod i sure wish had one! 8) | |
|
| |
Adsertif. Hero of Time
Posts : 11290 Registration date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 21st 2008, 7:39 pm | |
| iPod all the way they are much better I have one and I love it!! :) | |
|
| |
Walmart Adventurer
Posts : 413 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 21st 2008, 8:05 pm | |
| The only reason I can see to buy an iPod, is because it syncs with iTunes. But the downsides of iTunes, is that; 1. One dollar per song? If I buy twenty songs, I somehow have to fish out twenty bucks. After awhile it gets expensive. 2. Fourteen dollars for a movie, that only works with the iPod. When I can buy a movie for fourteen bucks, watch it on my TV, computer, or mp3 player. Seems ridiculous.
But of course there are always upsides to the whole iTunes thing. Another bad thing about the iPod, is it costs a fortune and within a year you are likely to lose it or break it. In the end, to me, it isn't worth the large price tag. But of course there are always upsides to buying a more popular mp3, such as the iPod.
Now the great thing about mp3 or mp4 players, is that you can buy a cheap one, and still get results. Yes, they may not sync with iTunes, but they have a lot going for them.
1. Cheaper. 2. Just as much performance as the iPod or more depending on how high you want to go. 3. Most of them have video. 4. You can buy one mp3 player and have it record, play FM radio, play video, and store pictures. But for the iPod you have to buy plug-ins which cost another 50 dollars more or less- per plug-in. And that makes me sad.
So overall I'll go with the mp3 player. | |
|
| |
Goobenheimer Last, Best Hope of Humanity
Posts : 8880 Registration date : 2008-02-01
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 21st 2008, 8:08 pm | |
| An iPod is an MP3 player. Are you just comparing an iPod with any other MP3 player?
I think iPods are better than any other device. iPods are so easy to use. | |
|
| |
jmg11 Super-Human
Posts : 3025 Registration date : 2008-01-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 21st 2008, 9:04 pm | |
| I would have an Ipod instead of an MP3 player. | |
|
| |
Dave Adept
Posts : 1586 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 5:05 am | |
| Walmart just get Limewire | |
|
| |
Cj2 Hero of Time
Posts : 11873 Registration date : 2008-01-25
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 9:24 am | |
| I got an iPod.All the music I put on it is free.I use LimeWire. | |
|
| |
Devious Dale Hero for Hire
Posts : 1341 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 9:27 am | |
| I have a iPod Touch. I totally think it's better than a MP3. I mean, I have Wi-Fi, YouTube, iTunes Built-In, Safari,Mail, etc.
iPods my choice. | |
|
| |
Walmart Adventurer
Posts : 413 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 10:35 am | |
| I already get all my music free through Google. Limewire does not work on my computer. | |
|
| |
Mickey4741 Paragon
Posts : 7260 Registration date : 2008-01-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 10:56 am | |
| - Walmart wrote:
- The only reason I can see to buy an iPod, is because it syncs with iTunes. But the downsides of iTunes, is that;
1. One dollar per song? If I buy twenty songs, I somehow have to fish out twenty bucks. After awhile it gets expensive. 2. Fourteen dollars for a movie, that only works with the iPod. When I can buy a movie for fourteen bucks, watch it on my TV, computer, or mp3 player. Seems ridiculous.
But of course there are always upsides to the whole iTunes thing. Another bad thing about the iPod, is it costs a fortune and within a year you are likely to lose it or break it. In the end, to me, it isn't worth the large price tag. But of course there are always upsides to buying a more popular mp3, such as the iPod.
Now the great thing about mp3 or mp4 players, is that you can buy a cheap one, and still get results. Yes, they may not sync with iTunes, but they have a lot going for them.
1. Cheaper. 2. Just as much performance as the iPod or more depending on how high you want to go. 3. Most of them have video. 4. You can buy one mp3 player and have it record, play FM radio, play video, and store pictures. But for the iPod you have to buy plug-ins which cost another 50 dollars more or less- per plug-in. And that makes me sad.
So overall I'll go with the mp3 player. 1. $20 shouldn't be that hard to get 2. If you download it through LimeWire, you can add it to itunes and then your ipod 3. iPods are as low as $49 now 4. You can store pictures and play FM and video 5. No plugins ;) 6. iPods are actually pretty durable 7. If you want cheap songs, go to Walmart or limewire | |
|
| |
Cj2 Hero of Time
Posts : 11873 Registration date : 2008-01-25
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 1:09 pm | |
| - Walmart wrote:
- I already get all my music free through Google. Limewire does not work on my computer.
How can you get music from Google? | |
|
| |
DK-Y2Y Super-Human
Posts : 3137 Registration date : 2008-02-01
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 1:11 pm | |
| I like an iPod more than an MP3 player. | |
|
| |
Walmart Adventurer
Posts : 413 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player February 22nd 2008, 4:46 pm | |
| - Cj wrote:
How can you get music from Google? It's a code you paste then you just bookmark it and use it through there. Like for instance if I was looking for In the End by Linkin Park I would type in on my browser "music in.the.end" and it would link me to all mp3 files with In The End as their name. It can be hard to find some songs, because it has to be files that people have posted on a page, and sometimes you can't even find them. | |
|
| |
Dieg Super-Human
Posts : 3251 Registration date : 2008-02-16
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 2nd 2008, 8:36 am | |
| I preffer the Ipod and I use limewire to not pay for the music and the ipod also has minigames :D | |
|
| |
K0olsuperdood Drifter
Posts : 47 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 6th 2008, 6:49 pm | |
| I think the iPod's better. | |
|
| |
Neo Adept
Posts : 1983 Registration date : 2008-01-26
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 6th 2008, 6:56 pm | |
| Hey, guess what? LIMEWIRE IS ILLEGAL. | |
|
| |
KingdomDarkII Forum Legend
Posts : 6175 Registration date : 2008-02-23
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 6th 2008, 7:09 pm | |
| geuss what? my computer crashed cause of it and we had 2 pay $200 to fix it | |
|
| |
RR Pinnacle of Survival
Posts : 8155 Registration date : 2008-01-31
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 6th 2008, 7:27 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
jmg11 Super-Human
Posts : 3025 Registration date : 2008-01-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 8th 2008, 11:07 am | |
| | |
|
| |
JazzDawg Vanguard
Posts : 4207 Registration date : 2008-03-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 27th 2008, 6:29 pm | |
| iPod. My iPod has never needed repairing, and it's very easy to put music and videos onto it. I would go with iPod, all the way. :) | |
|
| |
Argie Hero of Time
Posts : 11494 Registration date : 2008-03-08
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 27th 2008, 9:41 pm | |
| iPods. They are a bit pricey but what's wrong with business (pricey music)? You should probably be able to fish out 20 bucks. Really. | |
|
| |
Biggyp Sidekick
Posts : 556 Registration date : 2008-01-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 27th 2008, 10:16 pm | |
| I have to go with the Ipods. Mp3's are cheaper, but Ipods are more worth the price. They can hold more and they sound a lot better.
| |
|
| |
xXD34thXD3alrXx Mercenary
Posts : 784 Registration date : 2008-03-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player March 28th 2008, 12:58 pm | |
| I-P-O-D POD POD POD! Just like the Jets Fans!lol J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS! | |
|
| |
Arceus2468 Wanderer
Posts : 105 Registration date : 2008-03-29
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player April 1st 2008, 1:09 am | |
| Ipod is obvious better.Its a no brainer. | |
|
| |
pastrmi Drifter
Posts : 34 Registration date : 2008-03-27
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player April 1st 2008, 7:48 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Ipod vs. mp3 player | |
| |
|
| |
| Ipod vs. mp3 player | |
|