Appeal your infractions and/ or raise a dispute.

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 6980 Registration date : 2008-10-09

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 6980 Registration date : 2008-10-09

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

All right. Fair enough. It'll probably be ignored, anyway.
For all of you lurking the archives in the distant future, what I really wanted to say here is "are you fucking thick?

**Retired Staff** Posts : 6980 Registration date : 2008-10-09

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

All right. Fair enough. It'll probably be ignored, anyway.

I'll get an Admin, ASAP.

Lurker Posts : 9 Registration date : 2010-01-06

I appeal my infractions 4 and 5.
I made a single rude comment, not even a quarter line, and I am given 1/5 of a ban. I see it as an unfair. A warning, perhaps, but not an infraction.
And number 5. When was I at all rude to the staff? I told sjb to ban me if she dared, did I insult her?

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

All right. Fair enough. It'll probably be ignored, anyway.

I'll get an Admin, ASAP.

Well, you're quite the slow one, aren't you?
When did I ever post "inappropriate content?" I'm not mad enough to go ahead and post some porno here; even I have my limits, you know.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 6980 Registration date : 2008-10-09

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

All right. Fair enough. It'll probably be ignored, anyway.

I'll get an Admin, ASAP.

Well, you're quite the slow one, aren't you?

When did I ever post "inappropriate content?" I'm not mad enough to go ahead and post some porno here; even I have my limits, you know.

I PMed Triton and Brian, I guess the didn't get it or something..
And you posted a picture with a guys head " exploading", that's the only thing I could find. o_O

Vanguard Posts : 4956 Registration date : 2008-01-26

Sjb wrote:: I PMed Triton and Brian, I guess the didn't get it or something..
And you posted a picture with a guys head " exploading", that's the only thing I could find. o_O

If she posted it and was infracted for it, then the person who gave her the infraction probably removed it as well. You might not re-find it, but there could still be an infraction for it. Ask whoever gave it to her... Big Sb I think it was.

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:

Sjb wrote:

Maria wrote:: Legal double post.

"Infraction Reason #3 Advertising. 2/1/10"
I'd like to know when I advertised.
As I recall, the only link I posted in the past few weeks is the link to an RPG Name Generator (http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/roleplay-f63/conflagration-t30928.htm). I fail to see how linking to a website that benefits me in no way whatsoever, helps speed up the process of creating a new RPG character, and is fairly popular still considered advertising. If you think otherwise, I suggest handing out infractions whenever someone starts posting PlanetRenders/Youtube links.

Well, if the Admins say that's NOT advertising, they'll take it away, but it's staying until the Admins say whether or not it's advertising.

Advertising is a form of communication that typically attempts to
persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a
particular brand of product or service. Now, if I had actually posted that link in an attempt to persuade more people into using it simply because it benefits me in some way, then that would be the kind of advertising the rules were referring to. Besides, Seventh Sanctum is not a product/service that requires payment. The link I posted was still in context of the original "discussion;" it's not a forum I own nor is it a website I am associated with. It doesn't sway away any of the members of this forum. Seventh Sanctum = Planet Renders = Google = Youtube = FaceBook. Seventh Sanctum =/= Dock Penguins.

I'm letting the Admins deal with this. ;)

All right. Fair enough. It'll probably be ignored, anyway.

I'll get an Admin, ASAP.

Well, you're quite the slow one, aren't you?

When did I ever post "inappropriate content?" I'm not mad enough to go ahead and post some porno here; even I have my limits, you know.

I PMed Triton and Brian, I guess the didn't get it or something..
And you posted a picture with a guys head " exploading", that's the only thing I could find. o_O

That picture was from a movie, 'twas a plastic head exploding. People watch that kind of stuff on TV everyday, it's fake. How in the world is that inappropriate? iWaddle's shaving cream stunt was more risque than that.

Lurker Posts : 9 Registration date : 2010-01-06

ClanNintendoBank wrote:: I appeal my infractions 4 and 5.
I made a single rude comment, not even a quarter line, and I am given 1/5 of a ban. I see it as an unfair. A warning, perhaps, but not an infraction.
And number 5. When was I at all rude to the staff? I told sjb to ban me if she dared, did I insult her?

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

One of my infractions has expired.

Forum Legend Posts : 6175 Registration date : 2008-02-23

Maria wrote:: One of my infractions has expired.

Most of mine have.
Doesn't mean they'll be removed. :'(

Paragon Posts : 7114 Registration date : 2008-01-27

I have an infraction for a One Word Post on 2/15/10, and I looked through my posts and I don't have a one word post. So, I would like that revoked.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 3992 Registration date : 2008-11-18

Infraction #1 Reason : Rude.

When was I rude? If you're talking about sevensevenzero's thread, all I said was, Goodbye, ~~owner~~. If you're not talking about that, then tell me when was I rude?

**Retired Staff** Posts : 5616 Registration date : 2008-01-28

I just want to see where my two infractions are coming from, since no link is present on my profile.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 3286 Registration date : 2008-03-01

Hellopayton wrote:: I just want to see where my two infractions are coming from, since no link is present on my profile.

Me too, I want to see where my first infractions came from.

Also I'm on the verge of being banned because I made 3 one word posts and one accidental double post? Not for being rude or anything like that. Just a bunch of accidents and a new rule I didn't even know of. Help?

**Retired Staff** Posts : 5616 Registration date : 2008-01-28

Infraction #: 2
Why do you think it's unfair: Because I wasn't advertising anything and the moderator who assigned the infraction has no real idea of what "advertising" is.
Resource of infraction* (optional): http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/forum-discussion-f5/iamthegummybear-t31270.htm

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Infraction Reason
#2: Inappropriate
content/picture. 1/17/10 ~Big SbHow the heck is a special effects picture inappropriate?! I believe this one expired, too.

Infraction Reason
#3: Disrespect. 2/23/10
~Big Sb
Oh, so Big Cowboys wasn't disrespecting Marc, but I was disrespecting him? Nice logic, Big Sb.

Infraction Reason #4: One word post. 2/23/10 ~Sjb I was asked a question; I answered that question. Would it be any better if I said "Yes, my good sir, I do believe ducks are better than ninjas and pirates. Golly gee!"?

Infraction Reason #5: Spam. 2/23/10 ~Sjb There's a difference between image macros and "fdsjdjdj." Learn to differentiate between those two.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 6980 Registration date : 2008-10-09

When you just post a picture, that is Spam, or in my words "One image post with no words".

You could of said "Ducks, I say Ducks.", or something.
DB, you can't always get away with breaking the Rules, just because your an old Mod/User, and you think everybody loves you, doesn't mean you can.

**Retired Staff** Posts : 3992 Registration date : 2008-11-18

Sjb wrote:: When you just post a picture, that is Spam, or in my words "One image post with no words".

You could of said "Ducks, I say Ducks.", or something.
DB, you can't always get away with breaking the Rules, just because your an old Mod/User, and you think everybody loves you, doesn't mean you can.

Same for you. Just because you're moderator, doesn't mean you can go on infracting and banning people (example. madcat (he registered yesterday, he's still new. Give him a break)). And isn't this thread about appealing infractions we think are unfair? Last time I checked, it isn't a thread where you appeal your infraction and flame/or start a flame war just because we did.

The Chosen One Posts : 9446 Registration date : 2008-01-30

Sjb wrote:: When you just post a picture, that is Spam, or in my words "One image post with no words".

You could of said "Ducks, I say Ducks.", or something.
DB, you can't always get away with breaking the Rules, just because your an old Mod/User, and you think everybody loves you, doesn't mean you can.

"Spam" is a message that is completely unrelated to the subject; a post that isn't coherent; doesn't make any sense or carry a clear, straight-to-the-point message - whether it be an email/post that (falsely) advertises some kind of product, or more "dasdaksdjlasdajsldk"-ing.

I posted that image in the random forum, hence, I'm entitled to be random. It made perfect sense - you got the message out of it, did you not? And it's not like I'm advertising "the internet."
That image I posted contains words. Words have a purpose, a meaning. That, my dear, is not spam. If I compiled one of my posts into a big wall of text (Hint: Image with nothing but text), would that be considered spam? Your understanding of the term is misleading.

All right. Someone asks me if I like nuggets or fries better, would it make a difference if I said: "Oh my God! I adore fries!" or if simply said: "Fries." I like being straightforward and simple. Who are you to take away that privilege from me?

I'm not breaking the rules. You're just being a bit infraction happy at the moment. Funny, it almost seems like you have a personal vendetta against me.
Besides, just what does me being an old moderator and "user" (I love you) have to do with anything? Why do you insist on bringing that up while it has no relevance to the subject at hand?

**Retired Staff** Posts : 1822 Registration date : 2008-01-26

Maria-DB wrote:: Infraction Reason
#3: Disrespect. 2/23/10
~Big Sb
Oh, so Big Cowboys wasn't disrespecting Marc, but I was disrespecting him? Nice logic, Big Sb.

I gave you an infraction for your post here: http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/forum-discussion-f5/change-t31186-50.htm

Vanguard Posts : 4869 Registration date : 2008-10-23

Big Sb wrote:

Maria-DB wrote:: Infraction Reason
#3: Disrespect. 2/23/10
~Big Sb
Oh, so Big Cowboys wasn't disrespecting Marc, but I was disrespecting him? Nice logic, Big Sb.

I gave you an infraction for your post here: http://www.clubpenguinplanet.net/forum-discussion-f5/change-t31186-50.htm

That's five infractions for her.

See you in a week Maria.

» Appeal for infraction reduction
» SEXAUL APPEAL ADVERTISING
» Raise your hand if your tired of clubpenguin!!
» Infractions.
» how did i get 5 INFRACTIONS