Two New Mods!

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

.Tranquility wrote:

iWaddle wrote:

.Tranquility wrote:: Lol, like you need more than 1 mod on this dead forum, only active members are Ovaiz(Who obviously has no life), musicFreak and a few more

Cut your flaming you you'll end up with another infraction.

I have no motivation to stay here anymore, since i can chat with Boom on AIM 24/7 :D. Ban me if you want :shy:

Does that mean I can ban you?

Observer Posts : 360 Registration date : 2009-02-21

Chargers wrote:

.Tranquility wrote:

iWaddle wrote:

.Tranquility wrote:: Lol, like you need more than 1 mod on this dead forum, only active members are Ovaiz(Who obviously has no life), musicFreak and a few more

Cut your flaming you you'll end up with another infraction.

I have no motivation to stay here anymore, since i can chat with Boom on AIM 24/7 :D. Ban me if you want :shy:

Does that mean I can ban you?

Normally "ban me if you want" means that yes, you can. 8)

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! February 25th 2009, 11:57 pm

*whistles* A bit off-topic, are we?

Btt. xP
~Egaro

Adept Posts : 1526 Registration date : 2008-11-05

Congratulations to Chargers and RR.

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! February 26th 2009, 12:36 am

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

Observer Posts : 360 Registration date : 2009-02-21

Goobenheimer wrote:

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

"You can ban me if you want" sounds like "ban me" to me.

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

Payton wrote:

Goobenheimer wrote:

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

"You can ban me if you want" sounds like "ban me" to me.

Sounds like he wanted too to me. I got permission from the other staff, Goob.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! February 26th 2009, 8:31 am

Payton wrote:

Goobenheimer wrote:

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

"You can ban me if you want" sounds like "ban me" to me.

"You can ban me if you want"

He said if you want to ban him, you can. In my opinion you shouldn't ban him unless he gets 5 infractions or he directly asks to be banned. But I'm not gonna worry about because it's none of my business.

Observer Posts : 360 Registration date : 2009-02-21

Goobenheimer wrote:

Payton wrote:

Goobenheimer wrote:

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

"You can ban me if you want" sounds like "ban me" to me.

"You can ban me if you want"

He said if you want to ban him, you can. In my opinion you shouldn't ban him unless he gets 5 infractions or he directly asks to be banned. But I'm not gonna worry about because it's none of my business.

He said he wasn't going to visit the forum anymore (lie, I know), so it's pointless to keep his account.

Super-Human Posts : 3519 Registration date : 2008-01-26

Congratz RR and Chargers! Hope you do a Super-Job Moderating. :)

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! February 28th 2009, 1:53 pm

So now you can just "gift-a-modship"? Congrats to RR.

Lurker Posts : 3 Registration date : 2009-02-28

Poor choice, I still don't see the new forum moderators doing anything what so ever. That's just my opinion, though.

Mercenary Posts : 735 Registration date : 2009-01-19

Goobenheimer wrote:

Payton wrote:

Goobenheimer wrote:

Chargers wrote:: Thank-You.

OT: .Tranquility = banned like he requested.

He didn't request to be banned. He said he didn't care if he was. He should be banned if get gets 5 infractions or if he asks.

"You can ban me if you want" sounds like "ban me" to me.

"You can ban me if you want"

He said if you want to ban him, you can. In my opinion you shouldn't ban him unless he gets 5 infractions or he directly asks to be banned. But I'm not gonna worry about because it's none of my business.

I agree with you Goob

Great start Chargers!

So mook left and wanted chargers to become mod and you let it happenen -.-

What if Chao left and wanted me to become a elite penguin isn't right just like chargers isnt right becoming a mod ;)

Hero for Hire Posts : 1368 Registration date : 2008-11-04

con-con-congratulations to both! i hope u have fun! :)

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 2:30 am

Argie wrote:: So now you can just "gift-a-modship"? Congrats to RR.

Exactly what I was thinking, but then again, I guess you could say Chargers earned it.

@That Guy: For once, you actually have a point. (not trying to be mean)

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 1:29 pm

Earned it? As much as everyone else, including you, Triton. I guess he had favor because he gave Jazzdawg some iTunes giftcards. At least RR deserved it a lot. He was a very good moderator last time. Then again, new mods seem extremely unnecessary considering if we get hacked there are just more people to demod.

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

Argie wrote:: Earned it? As much as everyone else, including you, Triton. I guess he had favor because he gave Jazzdawg some iTunes giftcards. At least RR deserved it a lot. He was a very good moderator last time. Then again, new mods seem extremely unnecessary considering if we get hacked there are just more people to demod.

Before RR and I became mods, there were only 3 active moderators. They needed moderators. If you think I'm a bad mod, that's your opinion. I think I am doing a fine job here.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 1:49 pm

Chargers wrote:

Argie wrote:: Earned it? As much as everyone else, including you, Triton. I guess he had favor because he gave Jazzdawg some iTunes giftcards. At least RR deserved it a lot. He was a very good moderator last time. Then again, new mods seem extremely unnecessary considering if we get hacked there are just more people to demod.

Before RR and I became mods, there were only 3 active moderators. They needed moderators. If you think I'm a bad mod, that's your opinion. I think I am doing a fine job here.

Isn't Cycle being removed because he is too inactive?

:musicFREAK*:

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

Guys, these are things you don't need to know. You have been poking into the staffs buisness way to much. You guys need to stop asking personal staff questions. Thanks.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 3:25 pm

Eh, well, we should at least get to know at least somethings that go on, shouldn't we?

I want someone to name something recently that the users actually new about.
Not trying to offend you guys, but at least make us think we have some what of a "say" in this forum.

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

Yeah but not things like who will get demodded.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 3:59 pm

Chargers wrote:: Yeah but not things like who will get demodded.

Yea, I know, but I'm talking in general.

Just try to make it a goal to let us hear a little of what goes on. ;)

Vanguard Posts : 4319 Registration date : 2008-09-01

We will release things that need to be known to the users.

Subject: Re: Two New Mods! March 1st 2009, 4:07 pm

Ugh, fine. I'm done trying to argue my point.

» T-Mods!
» New Mods!
» Admins/Mods?
» Support Mods?
» I just saw one of CP's undercover mods :O